Since 1997, I have been trying to obtain the original
broadcast version of The Men Who Killed Kennedy documentary which aired in the
UK on 25th October 1988.
In 1998, I contacted Central Independent Television
duty office to see if I could obtain the original broadcast version from them, because after
the broadcast in 1988 the documentary caused much controversy due to the naming of the three "alleged" French hit
men. Later Central Television agreed to have an additional debate for balance, which was held in Washington DC, and was hosted by Peter Sissons.
The documentary was repackaged and edited because of the controversy
regarding the three named French hit men, and was sold to A&E.
In 2024 I managed to make contact with someone who had a copy of the original
broadcast, and allowed me to have a copy of it. I would like to give special thanks
to Steve Higgings for sending me the original recording he made in 1988.
The Men Who Killed Kennedy
Director - Nigel Turner Assistant Researcher - Susan Winter Production Company -
Central Independent Television
Here's a copy of Betty Ong's "alleged"
American Airlines flight attendant itinerary, which I’ve managed to track down,
which I believe was given to Harry Ong.
I will be discussing more about this evidence soon.
Harry Ong's Account Contacting American Airlines About His
Sister Betty Ong On Flight 11
This is a short clip with Harry Ong, (Betty Ong's brother), who says when he
contacted American Airlines on 9/11 to find out about Betty Ong, who was
"allegedly" a Flight Attendant on Flight 11, American Airlines
informed him that Betty was not on the itinerary for Flight 11.
Betty Ong allegedly made an airphone call to American Airlines, whereby she
stated she was on Flight 12, which was being hijacked, and not Flight 11. Also,
flight attendant Amy Sweeney also told Michael Woodward at American Airlines,
that she was Flight 12 also. So we have two flight attendants allegedly on
Flight 11, disclosing that they were on Flight 12. you can hear the phone call
below:
Note, much of the 20 minute phone call was redacted by the authorities. WHY?
Additionally, Flight 12 was the returning flight from LAX to
BOS, so it has been suggested that due to the stressful situation, both flight
attendants conveyed the wrong flight number. Ong did later say in the phone
call that she was on Flight 11. But nevertheless, it is strange how they both
made the same mistake?
I shall be unravelling this mystery, and covering in some
detail new evidence to suggest that Betty Ong was part of a live-fly hijacking
military exercise, which was taking place on 9/11.
My Good friend Andrew Johnson of the Check The Evidence
website, recently interviewed Prof. Morgan Reynolds and John Herold, MA, to
discuss their new co-authored book "ChatGPT and 9/11 - Operation Headfake:
A Thought Experiment with Artificial Intelligence".
I have had the book since last September 2025, and it made
compelling reading. Well worth investing in a copy would be my recommendation.
Colin Scoggins, a military operations specialist at the
FAA's Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, describes a joint FAA/military
training exercise held in 1995 or 1996 in which a real American Airlines
aircraft apparently played the part of a hijacked plane and this aircraft
"actually had passengers on board." Notably, two of the aircraft that
were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 11 and Flight 77) were also American Airlines
planes. This audio is a taken from Scoggins's interview with the 9/11 Commission
on September 24th, 2003.
Interestingly, Colin Scoggins played a major role on 9/11 in
the reporting that American Airlines Flight 11 was still airborne after it had
allegedly crashed into the North Tower in the official NORAD & FAA 9/11
Communications. See below:
According to this official recording from FAA and NORAD
communications, Flight 11's last coordinates were located 5.77 miles past the
North Tower, and after the crash time. Flight 11’s last coordinates were (4038N
07403W) which locates Flight 11 heading in the direction towards the Washington
area.
I wrote a detailed research article documenting evidence
that Flight 11 was possibly taking part in a military exercise scenario of a
plane crashing into the White House at 9:45 a.m. You can read the article here:
Why Was American Flight 11 Flying To Washington On 9/11
I was asked to join the Sheep Farm Podcast with hosts Dom and Christian, alongside longtime 9/11 research Andrew Johnson. Andrew kicks off giving an update on Richard D. Hall’s situation, and also details for the trust fund set-up for Richard’s son Lewis. https://www.richplanet.net/trust.php
We did via off topic here and there and talk about other subjects like, Project Blue Beam, Jo Cox Assassination, Consciousness, The 1984 & 2012 Olympics Games and the late Rik Clay. I’d like to thank Dom and Christian for inviting me on to their podcast.
I joined Mathiew Estepho of Math Easy Solutions (MES) on
his livestream to discuss - Where Did The Planes Go on 9/11? We discussed the
evidence that proves none of the 4 named planes crashed on 9/11.
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research joins the show again,
this time to discuss the alleged flights on 9/11, all of which were still
airborne after their alleged crash times.
I was delighted to be joined by long time, 9/11 planes
researcher Bon Runyon, also known on Substack as, Bob The Free Radical
Bob explains his observations and issues surrounding the impossible plane crash
physics involving Flight 175, the “alleged” second plane to crash into the
South Tower at 9:03 a.m. on 9/11.
9/11 Revisionist also
joined me as my co-host of the podcast. Thanks Norman!
Finally, we enjoyed our time speaking with Bob, and hope we can catch-up with
Bob again soon. We would sincerely like to thank Bob for making the time to
chat with us, as it was 4 a.m. in the morning for Bob in the USA when we
recorded this podcast.
I was invited back onto the Jerm Warfare Podcast again, to talk about my research into alleged planes on 9/11. In my presentation I dive into the intricate details
surrounding the events of 9/11, with a sharp focus on the planes involved (or,
rather, allegedly involved).
There is growing scepticism towards the official
narrative, underscoring the pivotal role of 9/11 in shaping public
consciousness, and scrutinise anomalies in flight data and eyewitness accounts.
Mark presents his research on the 'no planes' theory,
probing the role of technology and obvious cover-ups. The discussion also covers the physics of the impacts, the
significance of military exercises on that day, and peculiarities in passenger
manifests, urging listeners to question accepted narratives and consider the
deeper implications of 9/11.
Bio: Mark is a researcher and author known for his critical
analysis of the 9/11 events, particularly focusing on the anomalies surrounding
the alleged plane crashes.
Concluding, I would like to thank Jeremy Nell for inviting me onto his
podcast, and also UK Column for hosting it.
This was a planned podcast, that I did with 9/11 Revisionist, where we had a close to 3 hours deep-dive discussion
covering the 9/11 Truth Movement and the re-pivot of even more disinformation
and propaganda, especially when it comes to the "alleged" planes on
9/11. We discuss the propaganda that is being circulated about the planes on 9/11. In this discussion when look at the International Center For 9/11 Justice, and their role in the propaganda along with Richard Gage and others.
The Podcast Focus:
The International Center for 9/11 Justice - a brief
background
The re-pivoting
Captain Dan Hanley
Dr. Piers Robinson
The Truth Movement’s Role
Aidan Monaghan's Autopilot GPS Remote Takeover Theory
2007 Critical Analysis Paper - Remote Controlled Planes
What Really Happened With The 4 Planes
Evidence Ignored
Planes Telemetry Data - No ELT’s, ACARS, DCC Radar
Video Evidence: Missing Plane Wings
Impossible Plane Speeds
Video Fakery vs 3D Volumetric Projection Technology
This is a candid conversation I (9/11 Planes Research) had
with Norman (9/11 Revisionist) on 7th December 2024.
In the talk, we discuss in the conversation the re-pivoting of the International Center For 9/11 Justice, and how they are trying to control the alternative plane narrative, with remote controlled planes, while ignoring the aerodynamic capabilities, and Newtonian laws of physics. We also discuss other organisations who seemingly do not appear to be seeking the truth about the "alleged" planes on 9/11.
Math Easy Solutions (MES) arranged this live 9/11 roundtable
discussion debate Saturday 31st August 2024. I would like to thank Mat for inviting me to be part of the panel debate discussing planes and advanced technology aspects of 9/11.
Guests Speakers:
- Andrew Johnson aka Check The Evidence
- Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research
- Adam Eisenberg Pentagon whistleblower
- Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist
- William aka That's Life But Not As We Know It (TLBNAWKI)
- Chris Bergier, Aerospace engineer from Boston 9/11 Truth
- Keith aka Dr. Judy Wood's friend - Methylminer
I haven't been doing many interviews since 2021. However, I
was invited to speak about my research by Jeremy Nell from the Jerm Warfare
podcast show. Jeremy allowed me the time to take his viewers through all the
research I have been doing for the last 14 years. Here’s a short trailer
preview of my appearance on the Jerm Warfare podcast show, where I breakdown
the evidence data, which proves that none of the 4 named planes in the official
narrative crashed into the 4 named targets on 9/11. I also show evidence that the
4 planes were still airborne at the time of the crashes. Finally, I also
discuss what we were seeing hitting the towers, and also the hidden technology
involved
Please support and sign-up to Jerm Warfare's website for
early access to my interview, and many more interviews he's done with a number
of other great alternative knowledge researchers.
In this Power Point presentation, I discuss the "official" evidence and
telemetry data of flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93. I also explore many of the anomalies and
discrepancies surrounding the official evidence.
I will leave the viewer to draw their own conclusions from what is presented in this presentation.
Here's a selection of interviews talking about training exercises drills involving hijacked planes pre-9/11. These videos were uploaded on Shoestring's YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@Shoestring911
Exercise Was Held Shortly Before 9/11 Based on the
Scenario of 'a Jetliner Striking the Pentagon'
Two clinics at the Pentagon held a training exercise in the summer of 2001
that, presciently, was based around the scenario of an airliner crashing into
the Pentagon. This is revealed by John Baxter, who was commander of the Air
Force Flight Medicine Clinic at the time of the 9/11 attacks. Baxter recalls
that in the summer of 2001, he and James Geiling, then commander of the
DiLorenzo Tricare Health Clinic, discussed having a joint exercise between
their two clinics. They "decided on a scenario of a jetliner striking the
Pentagon at the heliport," Baxter says. They didn't envision the crash
being the result of terrorism, though. Instead, they were thinking about the
fact that planes coming in to land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
turned right over the Pentagon as they made their final approach to the
airport. The two men therefore "thought it would be a somewhat realistic
scenario that one of these airliners could get off course, get their altitude
wrong, have a mechanical problem, and strike the Pentagon." The resulting
exercise helped them identify a few "issues that were deficient" and
correct these problems before the Pentagon was attacked on September 11 that
year. This is an excerpt from episode 162 of the podcast series, "Borne
the Battle," which was released on September 11, 2019.
C-130 Cargo Planes Sometimes Played Hijacked Aircraft in Military Exercises,
NORAD Employee Reveals
A woman who was working as an ID technician at NORAD's Northeast Air Defense
Sector (NEADS) on September 11, 2001, reveals that a C-130--a type of military
cargo aircraft--would sometimes be used to play a hijacked plane in NORAD
training exercises. The ID tech--either Shelley Watson or Stacie
Rountree--explains that when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was
involved in NORAD exercises, "the majority of the time we had a military
aircraft, real-world, out there flying over land, coming into our area where we
were gonna hold the exercise." The ID tech goes on to specify that the
military aircraft playing a hijacked plane in the exercise could be a C-130,
saying that the FAA would be instructed, "This guy's a C-130, he's gonna
fake these guys out, he's gonna pretend he's hijacked, don't tell [NEADS] who
it is." This clip is taken from "Team 8 Interview with Maureen
Dooley, Shelley Watson, and Stacie Roundtree of the Northeast Air Defense
Sector." 9/11 Commission, October 27, 2003, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/20701...
. The clip begins just over 55 minutes into the full audio file. Image credit:
Stacia Rountree / Eastern Air Defense Sector.
United Airlines Held a Realistic Drill 12 Days Before 9/11 That Simulated
One of Its Planes Crashing
Andy Studdert, chief operating officer of United Airlines on
September 11, 2001, describes a shockingly realistic "no-notice
drill" he arranged that was held on August 30, 2001. In it, airline
employees were led to believe one of their Boeing 747s had crashed while flying
over the Pacific Ocean, on its way to Australia. Studdert initially allowed
personnel in the airline's operations center to think the crash was real. Many
of them were devastated. There were "people throwing up in the hall"
and "people crying," Studdert recalls. Only after half an hour did he
reveal the truth, announcing, "This has been a no-notice drill, there is
no event, everything's fine." Twelve days later, two United Airlines
planes were hijacked as part of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Studdert claims
that many people subsequently came up to him and thanked him because, as a
result of his drill, "we were ready" on September 11. This is an
excerpt from "Preparing Your Organization for a Crisis: Lessons From
United Airlines Emergency Preparation, Pre-9/11," an interview with Andy
Studdert by the Center for Values-Driven Leadership at Benedictine University
on February 27, 2012.
Pre-9/11 Hijack Exercise Involved an American Airlines
Plane with Real People Playing Its Passengers
Colin Scoggins, a military operations specialist at the
FAA's Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, describes a joint FAA/military
training exercise held in 1995 or 1996 in which a real American Airlines
aircraft apparently played the part of a hijacked plane and this aircraft
"actually had passengers on board." Notably, two of the aircraft that
were hijacked on 9/11--Flight 11 and Flight 77--were also American Airlines
planes. This audio is a taken from Scoggins's interview with the 9/11 Commission
on September 24, 2003.
A photo of United 93 passenger Nicole Carol Miller at Newark Airport has been circulating the internet, which is
thought to show Nicole about to board her flight, United 93 on 9/11. After extensive
research into the original "uncropped" photograph which I obtained, I
can now confirm that the photograph was most likely taken a couple days before 9/11. If look closely you can see the AA logo on the boarding sign. The photo appears to be taken as Nicole was boarding an American
Airlines flight, not a United flight.
Nicole was on vacation in
NYC and NJ. Nicole was originally due to fly back to San
Jose, California on the 10th September, according to her father, however because
of a thunderstorm on the evening of 10th September, it forced
Nicole to be rescheduled onto United 'Flight 93' the next morning, 11th
September 2001.
Below, I can share an exclusive uncropped
version of the photograph of Nicole, which to my knowledge is a very rare version of the photograph.
I have also obtained a short piece of video footage of
Nicole at a family wedding. I hope this clears up the misinformation which has been circulating the internet about this photograph.
In this video I discuss
American Airlines Flight 77's "official" DCC Radar flight path, using
the "official" radar evidence which was obtained under a Freedom of
Information Act. (FOIA). The DCC Radar data has not been seen by the public
until its release. The DCC radar data coordinates were very different to the
Rades84 coordinates, which is a major conflict for the "official"
narrative. The DCC Radar evidence is also backed-up by FAA & NORAD
communication recordings and transcripts, showing that AA77 did not turn around
on the Kentucky OHIO boarder, and head back towards Washington, but continued
in its flight path towards Falmouth, St Louis and Missouri and into Kansas,
before heading back again towards Missouri and then back to Kansas, then disappearing
off radar.
Thank you all for your interest in my research. Please Like or Subscribe to my channel, and feel free to leave a comment or feedback. I do try to interact with my subscribers who leave comments.
In this video I discuss the discrepancies between American Airlines Flight 77's flight path, using two different pieces of "official" radar evidence, between the Rades84 radar data and DCC radar data. The DCC radar data was only released under a Freedom of Information request, and has not been seen by the public until its release. I also discuss "official" Air Traffic Control (ATC) transcripts evidence, which backs up the DCC radar data coordinates, along with CNN News coverage, showing Flight Explorer radar path for AA77, no making a turn back towards Washington.
Thank you all for your interest in my research. Please follow my blog, or subscribe to my YouTube channel, and leave a like or comment.
This photograph is "allegedly" of American Airlines "Flight 77" at
Dulles Airport on 9/11, taken by Gwen Faulkner. This is the same lady who
took two other photographs of some of the passengers at Gate D26, which I
shared in a previous blog post. Gwen took photographs of the school pupils who won a National Geographic
competition who were being accompanied by their teachers on the trip on 9/11.
Here's the other two photographs below, taken by Gwen Faulkner, of the school children with their teachers, and two National Geographic
Channel people on the right at Dulles Airport on 9/11.
The photograph below was taken at the boarding gate D26, when the school children and
teachers were boarding the plane, along with capturing some of the other
passengers too who boarded Flight 77.
List of Passengers:
A: Dora Marie Menchaca
B: Dong Chul Lee
C: Sara M. Clark
D: Robert Penninger
E: James D. Debeuneure
F: Asia S. Cottom
G: Karen Ann Kincaid
H: Rodney Dickens
This is an interview which I found worthy of a share on my blog. It is from 2007 with Rowland Morgan who
is the author of the book - Flight 93 Revealed: What Really Happened on the
9/11 "let's Roll" Flight? This interview was conducted by Guns &
Butter in 2007.
