I joined Mathiew Estepho of Math Easy Solutions (MES) on his livestream to discuss - Where Did The Planes Go on 9/11? We discussed the evidence that proves none of the 4 named planes crashed on 9/11.
Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research joins the show again,
this time to discuss the alleged flights on 9/11, all of which were still
airborne after their alleged crash times.
Thanks for watching & caring!
I was delighted to be joined by long time, 9/11 planes
researcher Bon Runyon, also known on Substack as, Bob The Free Radical
Bob explains his observations and issues surrounding the impossible plane crash
physics involving Flight 175, the “alleged” second plane to crash into the
South Tower at 9:03 a.m. on 9/11.
9/11 Revisionist also
joined me as my co-host of the podcast. Thanks Norman!
Please give Bob a Subscribe at his Substack - https://substack.com/@bobthefreeradical
9/11 Planes Research Substack - https://911planesresearch.substack.com
9/11 Revisionist Substack - https://911revision.substack.com
Finally, we enjoyed our time speaking with Bob, and hope we can catch-up with
Bob again soon. We would sincerely like to thank Bob for making the time to
chat with us, as it was 4 a.m. in the morning for Bob in the USA when we
recorded this podcast.
Thanks for watching & listening!
By Mark Conlon
This was a planned podcast, that I (9/11 Planes Research)
did with 9/11 Revisionist, where we had a close to 3 hours deep-dive discussion
covering the 9/11 Truth Movement and the re-pivot of even more disinformation
and propaganda, especially when it comes to the "alleged" planes on
9/11.
The Podcast Focus:
The International Center for 9/11 Justice - a brief background
The re-pivoting
Captain Dan Hanley
Dr. Piers Robinson
The Truth Movement’s Role
Aidan Monaghan's Autopilot GPS Remote Takeover Theory
2007 Critical Analysis Paper - Remote Controlled Planes
What Really Happened With The 4 Planes
Evidence Ignored
Planes Telemetry Data - No ELT’s, ACARS, DCC Radar
Video Evidence: Missing Plane Wings
Impossible Plane Speeds
Video Fakery vs 3D Volumetric Projection Technology
Thanks for watching & caring!
By Mark Conlon
Math Easy Solutions (MES) arranged this live 9/11 roundtable
discussion debate Saturday 31st August 2024. I would like to thank Mat for inviting me to be part of the panel debate discussing planes and advanced technology aspects of 9/11.
Guests Speakers:
- Andrew Johnson aka Check The Evidence
- Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research
- Adam Eisenberg Pentagon whistleblower
- Norman aka 9/11 Revisionist
- William aka That's Life But Not As We Know It (TLBNAWKI)
- Chris Bergier, Aerospace engineer from Boston 9/11 Truth
- Keith aka Dr. Judy Wood's friend - Methylminer
Original link to the video here:
https://www.youtube.com/live/CXUcJD38bPQ?si=-Wyb2coTM5Zzh3Br
Thanks for watching & caring!
By Mark Conlon
On the morning of 9/11, Anthony F. Mazza was working at
Newark Airport as a fuelling technician. One of the planes he provided with
fuel was United Airlines 'Flight 93'. In the cockpit of the plane he met a
person who was apparently neither Leroy Homer, Jr, the co-pilot, nor Jason
Dahl, the pilot.
On Oct. 19, 2001, Anthony F. Mazza was interviewed by the
FBI. Here's the FBI report:
Anthony F. Mazza, Mazza worked as a fueler for Ogden Aviation Services at
Newark International Airport since 1973. Mazza fuelled United Airlines ‘Flight
93’ on September 11, 2001 prior to its departure and crash in western
Pennsylvania. Mazza stated that everything seemed normal on the flight
including the amount of fuel that was pumped into Flight 93's tank. Mazza
stated that prior to the passengers boarding Flight 93, he had completed
fuelling the plane and proceeded to the cockpit to inform the co-pilot of the
completed task. This has been the standard operating procedure for United
flights out of Newark for many years. Mazza entered the cockpit where he handed
the fuelling sheet to a young Caucasian male, well groomed, brown hair and a
white shirt, who was sitting in the co-pilot's seat. The male responded to
Mazza by saying thank you and taking the paper from him. Mazza then departed
Flight 93 prior to the passengers boarding. Mazza stated that this was approximately
30 minutes prior to the scheduled departure time. Mazza was interviewed by FAA
employee John Patani shortly after the crash in western Pennsylvania. Mazza
stated that he reported that there was nothing unusual on the day of the flight
and that the plane had been fuelled without incident
On Friday, October 12, 2001 Mazza saw a memorial for the
crew of Flight 93 and saw pictures of the co-pilot of Flight 93. The picture
was the actual co-pilot of Flight 93, who was Leroy Homer. Mazza stated that he
was certain that the co-pilot he spoke with was not Mr. Homer.
http://www.911myths.com/images/e/ed/Team7_Box12_LeroyHomer.pdf
Who was the "male" in the co-pilot's seat, if it
wasn't neither Leroy Homer nor Jason Dahl, the pilot? After seeing the
memorial, Mazza obviously took the initiative to contact the FBI. Had he
identified Dahl - whose picture he certainly saw, too - as the "male",
he would not have felt compelled to call the FBI? When interviewing Mazza, the
FBI surely asked him about this possibility and probably showed photos of Dahl
again. In any case, the absence of Dahl in the report makes it clear that he was
not the "male" either, and Dahl was 43 years old, not really a young
man like the "male" as described by Mazza.
Jere Longman describes the United Airlines routine
pre-flight procedures:
Before the passengers board a plane, it has to be
checked, of course. Basically the captain looks after the cockpit instruments
along a pre-flight checklist while the first officer checks the plane outside
(tires etc.).
The fact that Mazza met neither Dahl nor Homer is even more
compelling than the presence of the "male". Again, is this further
evidence indicating that duplicate airplanes were involved on 9/11? As I
mentioned earlier, it is now known that according to United Airlines ACARS
messages, UAL 93 took-off at 8:28 a.m. in stark contradiction to the
"official" take-off time of 8:42 a.m.
Original Article Source:
http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2009/09/who-was-male-in-flight-93s-co-pilot.html
By Mark Conlon
I haven't been doing many interviews since 2021. However, I
was invited to speak about my research by Jeremy Nell from the Jerm Warfare
podcast show. Jeremy allowed me the time to take his viewers through all the
research I have been doing for the last 14 years. Here’s a short trailer
preview of my appearance on the Jerm Warfare podcast show, where I breakdown
the evidence data, which proves that none of the 4 named planes in the official
narrative crashed into the 4 named targets on 9/11. I also show evidence that the
4 planes were still airborne at the time of the crashes. Finally, I also
discuss what we were seeing hitting the towers, and also the hidden technology
involved
Sign-up here: https://jermwarfare.com/
By Mark Conlon
In this Power Point presentation, I discuss the "official" evidence and
telemetry data of flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93. I also explore many of the anomalies and
discrepancies surrounding the official evidence.
I will leave the viewer to draw their own conclusions from what is presented in this presentation.
Thanks for watching and Caring!
