This is a very important presentation by Calum Douglas, who is a researcher for 'Pilots For 9/11 Truth'. Calum presents his investigation into the "official" flight data recorder information from American Airlines 'Flight 77' which hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, The data was obtained under
the US Freedom of Information Act. Play video from this link here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XrlUc0nDRvji/ Or play the video embedded below:
Video of his presentation was recorded 8th June 2007 at the Indian YMCA in London. Opening sequence by Calum Douglas, produced by flamesong.com - okulomedia.com
On 22nd December 2014, a bin lorry crashed into pedestrians in Glasgow city
centre, killing six people and injuring 15 others. After mounting the pavement,
the bin lorry travelled for 19 seconds, striking pedestrians, initially
accelerating to 25 mph before dropping to 19 mph and 10 mph as it struck walls
and other street furniture. The bin lorry came to rest on top of a silver Volvo
estate vehicle, between the entrance to Queen Street Railway Station and
Millennium Hotel in George Square at around 14:30 GMT.
Below: View from Google Earth
The 26-tonne council-own bin lorry was being driven by
58-year-old Harry Clarke, with two crew members seated in the rear compartment.
While the bin lorry was travelling north, Clarke blacked out just after the
traffic lights at the Gallery of Modern Art.
Clarke had a similar blackout previously wheel in the
driving seat of a bus. He had not disclosed that incident on his heavy goods
vehicle license renewal application, despite such self-reporting being
mandatory.
Clarke was officially told he would not face further
prosecution, effectively giving him immunity over the deaths, causing protests
from victims' families at the way the case had been handled.
The Foreshadowing of the 2014 Glasgow Bin Lorry Incident
There appears to be some type of foreshadowing of the
Glasgow bin lorry accident embedded into the opening scene of the film - World
War Z.
1. The opening scene has a bin lorry travelling down the street crashing
into cars and killing people. Also, the lead character’s (Brad Pitt) car is a
silver Volvo estate.
2. The film location used in the open scene was Glasgow,
which doubled as Philadelphia during the outbreak of the zombie pandemic. The
most prominent film locations used for filming the opening scene was Cochrane
Street and George Square.
See Below: The silver Volvo estate and the bin lorry
during filming on the corner of George Square and Cochrane Street.
World War Z: Opening Scene Behind the Scenes
So, in the 2011 film, the opening scene has a bin lorry
travelling down a street (Cochrane Street heading towards George Square in
Glasgow) crashing into cars and killing people. The lead actor’s car which
later crashes on the corner of George Square, which is a silver estate Volvo.
And in the 2014 Glasgow crash, we have a bin lorry travelling down Queens
Street, which kills people and crashes into cars, and comes to rest on George
Square, on top of a silver Volvo estate car.
What are the chances of such similarities?
1. Bin lorry 2.
Silver estate Volvo 3. The 2011 film location in Glasgow, George Square 4. The
2014 Glasgow crash location in George Square involving Silver estate car
Below,
I have plotted the film locations of the bin lorry crash and also Brad Pitt’s
Volvo car, along with the real 2014 bin lorry accident location.
Both the scene in the film, and bin lorry crash in 2014,
have an extraordinary set of circumstances. See below, the car in the opening
scene of the 2011 film.
Below, is the car involved in the 2014 accident.
What are the chances of all these circumstance all coming
together?
Occult Numerology
Number 19
Interestingly, the 2011 World War Z film is
set during pandemic, and the 2014 Glasgow crash is said to have unfolded over a
19 second period. Here we have a pandemic and the number 19. The so-called 2020
pandemic, which had an “alleged” virus which was named COVID 19.
The COVID-19
Origin Name
The name "COVID-19" was chosen by the World Health
Organization (WHO) for the disease caused by an “alleged” novel coronavirus
first identified in Wuhan, China, in 2019. The name stands for
"coronavirus disease 2019.
Glasgow to 9/11 “The Number 19 & Millennium
Hotel”
We also see this the number 19
associated with 9/11. The narrative has 19 “alleged” hijackers. We also have
the Millennium Hotel associated with 9/11, which stood like a Monolith next to
the Twin Towers. So again as with Glasgow, we have the number 19, and also the
Millennium Hotel where the crashed bin lorry came to rest by.
The Number 22
The
number 22 has been associated with various significant world events throughout
history. For instance, on May 22, 1922, General Michael Collins was assassinated
in West Cork during the Irish Civil War. Additionally, on November 22, 1963,
President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. The number 22 also
features heavily in the May 22, 2017 Manchester Arena Attack with also 22
“alleged” deaths.
The Number 23
We also
have the number 23, which is embedded into the Glasgow crash, with the crash
happening at around 2:30PM. (23). The bin lorry was being driven by 58-year-old
Harry Clarke, the surname Clarke features with the number 23 with author William
Burroughs, who was obsessed with the number 23. While living in Tangiers, he
met a Captain Clark who ran a ferry between Spain and Morocco. One day, Clark
told Burroughs that he had been doing the route for 23 years without incident.
Later that day, the ferry sank, killing the captain. While Burroughs was
thinking about the incident, a radio bulletin announced the crash of a Flight
23 on the New York-Miami route. The pilot was another Captain Clark. The events
prompted an obsession which saw Burroughs record every occurrence of the number
23 for the rest of his life.
Additionally, the number 23 features in the 9/11 story, with
a 5th “alleged” attempted hijacked plane, United “Flight 23”. We also have the
announcement on September 10th 2001, of the unaccounted for 2.3 trillion
dollars (23). Plus, the date September 11th 2001, adds up to the number 23.
9+11+2+1 = 23.
The occult numerology is
endless with engineered world events, especially the “Number 23”, which I have
been researching for a long time, and will be writing about in the coming
months in great detail.
Myself and Andrew Johnson joined The Collective Conspiracy Show with host Kieran Woodhouse to discuss the
abusive relationship that has been set-up between the UK Government and British
public during the on-going Covid restrictions. We discuss the extreme level of gaslighting that
has been perpetrated by the Government to manipulate the public using fear to
control and manipulate people/society.
We go through the 7 stages of gaslighting, and how it relates to the control
measures during the Covid restrictions.
Myself
and Andrew Johnson joined The Collective Conspiracy Show with host Kieran
Woodhouse to discuss the on-going Covid draconian measures being imposed on the
British people.
I was asked by the host Kieran Woodhouse of the Collective Conspiracy Show, to appear alongside Andrew Johnson to talk about 9/11, and the destruction of the World Trade Center towers.
Thanks to all those who tuned-in to the livestream, and to those who are listening on catch-up.
One thing we can say for sure, those who called their relatives from their cell
phones could not of placed those calls while the plane was inflight.
Minutes after the fourth plane had crashed in Pennsylvania, news reports were
already circulating that several passengers had made phone calls with their
cell phones from the hijacked planes. The problem is, in 2001 it was
practically impossible to make a cell phone call from a plane at cruising
altitudes. Cellular phones use low power transmitters, both to preserve battery
life, and to keep the cost of unit down. It is up to the receiving towers on
the ground to pick up and boost their signal, before they route it through the
system. It is commonly known that beyond 10,000 feet, cell phones become
useless, and passenger planes usually cruise at 30,000 feet and beyond.
In 2005 The Washington Post wrote:
“Most cell phones can’t reach a station from beyond 10,000 feet. Another
technical hurdle is to find a way that cell phone calls could be handed off
from one cell phone tower to another on the ground, when an aircraft is
travelling at 500 miles per hour.”
Analysis of the official Evidence
Only in two cases did the authorities openly state that a cell phone was used.
One is a call placed at 9:58 a.m. by Edward Felt, who allegedly locked himself
in the toilet.
The second call is Flight Attendant Cee Cee Lyles, who called
her husband Lorne Lyles, who was surprised to have received the phone call from
her cell phone, which he expressed in a television documentary called Portrait
of Courage: The Untold Story of Flight 93.
Lorne described that, after the call got disconnected: "I looked at the
caller ID, and noticed that it was a call, and it was from her cell phone. And
I'm like, OK, wait a minute. How can she call me from on the plane from a cell
phone, because cell phones don't work on a plane? That's what I'm thinking."
See video below:
Video Source: Portrait of Courage: The Untold Story of
Flight 93.
It’s one thing the cell phone calls that authorities admitted to, it’s another
the number of cell phone calls which were actually made. In the days following
9/11, the FBI interviewed relatives who received phone calls from their
relatives on the planes, and their reports tell a very different story.
One of the FBI’s report states:
Starting at approximately 6:30 a.m. PST (which is 9:30 a.m. New York time),
Deena Burnett received a series of three to five cellular phone calls from her
husband Thomas Burnett. Deena was able to determine that her husband was using
his own cellular phone because it showed his cell phone number. Only one of the
calls did not show his caller ID because she was on the phone to another caller
when Thomas called her. Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com
According to the official documentation, Thomas Burnett made a total of 3
calls. One at 9:30:32 a.m. lasting 28 seconds, one at 9:37:53 a.m. lasting 62
seconds and one at 9:44:23 a.m. lasting 54 seconds. This means that two of
these calls if not all three were made from Thomas Burnett’s cellular
phone.
At 9:30 a.m. United 93 was flying at 32,000 feet, and
climbing. At 9:37 a.m. it had reached 37,000 feet, and was still climbing. At
9:44 a.m. the plane had descended to 22,000 feet, while accelerating reaching a
speed of 400 miles per hour, making it impossible for any of Thomas Burnett’s
cell phone calls to have been made from the plane at those altitudes and speed
the plane was traveling.
According to another official report, Jeremy Glick used his cell phone to call
Makely his step-mother, to report the hijacking. Glick then asked to talk to
his wife Lyzbeth. According to the FBI report, Lyzbeth could not hear any
unusual sounds in the background of the call, and the connection was extremely
clear, as if he was calling from the next room. The document also states, that
cell phone call communication was lost at 9:55 a.m. Source: FBI FD302a –
intelwire.com
Glick called at 9:37:41 a.m. which means the communication
lasted uninterrupted for 18 minutes, while the plane was flying between 37,000
feet and 10,000 feet at an average speed of almost 400 miles per hour.
It is impossible that Glick’s cell phone call was able to be maintained for
that duration of time while the plane was travelling at such high altitudes and
speed, without the call dropping out or having interruption problems with the
hand off signals between the cell phone towers on the ground.
Lauren Grandcolas had a cell phone, and it revealed in the
FBI documents that Lauren borrowed her cell phone to Honor Wainio, who called
her parents at 9:53:43 a.m., and the call lasted 269 seconds. The plane would
have been at 10,000 feet at this time, travelling at close to 400 miles per
hour.
Linda Gronlund also used her own cell phone to call her
sister at 9:46:05 a.m. and the duration of her call was 71 seconds. The plane
was traveling at 17,000 feet and travelling at almost 400 miles per hour.
Marion Britton was also a passenger on United 93. Britton contacted her
boyfriend, Fred Fiumano on a cell phone that Britton had borrowed from another
passenger according Fiumano in the FBI document. Britton’s call to her
boyfriend was at 9:49:12 a.m. and the duration was 232 seconds. United 93 was
traveling beyond 13,000 feet at this time, and travelling at a speed of 420
miles per hour.
Peter Hanson, a passenger on United 175 contacted his mother on his cell phone
and informed his mother that his flight had been hijacked. Peter’s father Lee
Hanson said, that he resisted the temptation to call his son back as he didn’t
want to put his some in more danger by having his cell phone ring on the
plane. Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com
Peter Hanson called his parents twice at 8:52:00 a.m. with a
duration of 99 seconds, and at 9:00:03 a.m. with the call duration lasting 192
seconds. At 8:52 a.m. United 175 was at 30,000 feet, and it was climbing in
altitude. And at 9:00 a.m. the plane flying at over 18,000 feet in altitude,
while accelerating at 586 miles per hour at sea level.
Brian Sweeney was also a passenger on United 175. After learning of the attacks
said the FBI, his wife Julie Sweeney arrived home to learn that her husband had
left a message from his cell phone at approximately 8:58 a.m. on their
answering machine. Sweeney made his call at 8:58:45 a.m. and the duration was
28 seconds, when the plane was at 25,000 feet in altitude.
While anyone of these phone calls could have been connected
through a fortunate set of coincidences, it should be obvious that all these
cell phone calls as a whole could not have been made from the cruising planes.
Question:
Given the known limitations of a cellular phone system in 2001, can you provide
any evidence that the cell phone calls made by the passengers reported by the
FBI could have been made from the altitudes , speeds, and for the durations
indicated for each of them?
The answer is NO.
Scientific Experiments Conducted:
A. K. Dewdney who is a scientist, conducted a series of experiments using cell
phones from a small propeller aircraft, over the city of London, Ontario in
Canada. (He noted that, "not only is the cell phone technological base
in Canada identical to its U.S. counterpart, but Canadian communication
technology is second to none, Canada being a world leader in research and
development."
Source: http://physics911.net/projectachilles
Dewdney found:
Cell phone calls from commercial aircraft much over 8,000 feet are essentially
impossible, while those below 8,000 feet are highly unlikely down to about
2,000, where they become merely unlikely. Moreover, even at the latter altitude
(and below), the handoff problem appears. Any airliner at or below this
altitude, flying at the normal speed of approximately 500 mph, would encounter
the handoff problem. An aircraft traveling at this speed would not be over the
cell site long enough to complete the electronic "handshake" (which
takes several seconds to complete) before arriving over the next cell site,
when the call has to be handed off from the first cell site to the next one.
This also takes a few seconds, the result being, in the optimal case, a series
of broken transmissions that must end, sooner or later, in failure. Source:
http://physics911.net/cellphoneflight93
An article published by the Travel Technologist shortly after 9/11 stated:
"Wireless communications networks weren't designed for ground-to-air
communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they're surprised the
calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they lasted as
long as they did."
Source: http://www.elliott.org/technology/2001/cellpermit.htm
Wireless Review similarly commented:
"Because wireless networks are designed for terrestrial use, the fact
that so many people were able to call from the sky [on September 11] brings
into question how the phones worked from such altitudes. Alexa Graf, AT&T
spokesperson, said systems are not designed for calls from high altitudes,
suggesting it was almost a fluke that the calls reached their destinations."
Source: http://telephonyonline.com/wireless/mag/wireless_final_contact/
United 93 hijacking time discrepancy:
This opens the way to the disturbing possibly which seems to support that the
passengers were forced to call their relatives under duress, pretending to be
on the plane. To support of this hypothesis, there is evidence to study.
If we study the call Todd Beamer had with GTA airphone operator Lisa Jefferson,
during the alleged hijack of United 93. It is through this phone call with
Jefferson that the world learned of the famous call to action “Let’s Roll”. The
9/11 Commission established the hijacking took place at 9:28 a.m. Yet Todd
Beamer was connected to Jefferson at 9:43 a.m. which is 15 minutes into the
hijacking. Yet the FBI report confirms Jefferson received the call from Beamer
at approximately 8:45 a.m. Central Time (which is 9:45 a.m. Eastern Time). Yet
the contents of Beamer’s conversation with Jefferson are at odds with the
official narrative.
According to Jefferson, “Beamer called to state that the plane was about to
be hijacked.” He stated, “that three individuals, two wielding knives,
the third with a bomb strapped to his waist with a red belt, were preparing to
take control of the flight”. Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com
Jefferson estimated she spoke to Beamer for 7 minutes, before two hijackers
armed with knives entered the cockpit.” Source: FBI FD302a –
intelwire.com
This would place the hijacking around 9:52 a.m., yet officially the hijacking
took place at 9:28 a.m. This is a major discrepancy in the official story of
the when the hijacking took place, which leads to the question, of how could
Beamer be describing events that are supposed to be happening in front of his
eyes, when in fact they had already happened approximately 25 minutes
earlier?
How could the terrorists be “preparing to take control of the flight” at
9:45 a.m. when they had already been in the cockpit for 15 minutes?
Moreover, the FBI also wrote, that “Jefferson noted that the call had
unusually low amount of background noise.” This was also noted by Lyzbeth
Glick, who noticed with her phone call she received from Jeremy’s phone call.
Furthermore, the records show, Beamer’s phone call lasted 3,2925 seconds,
approximately 1 hour. The strange element is, it is alleged by Jefferson that
the phone line was left open for another 45 minutes after the crash, which
would have been impossible, being as airphones are powered by the plane’s
electrical system, which is also inconceivable considering, the plane was
allegedly destroyed into tiny pieces at the crash site.
Jefferson stated:
“We didn’t lose a connection, because there’s a different sound that you
use. I never lost connection it just went silent.” Source: “I Promised I
wouldn’t Hang Up” beliefnet.com
The FBI stated:
“Jefferson stayed on the phone until she learned Flight 93 had crashed.”
Source: FBI FD302a – intelwire.com
All these discrepancies indicate that Beamer was not on the plane observing
real events unfolding, but seemingly describing an imaginary pre-scripted
situation from a different location. It must be considered that the passengers
and crew were part of a hijacking training exercise scenario, either knowingly,
or unknowing, where they did not know their end fate?
12 days before 9/11, such a training scenario of hijacked plane including
cell phone calls being made as part of the scenario was carried out.
On the 31st August 2001, the US Department of Transportation
(DOT), Crisis Management Center engaged in a war game training exercise which
involved the scenario of cell phone calls being made from a hijacked plane.
According to Ellen Engleman, the administrator of the DOT’s Research and
Special programs Administration, commented that this was “actually much more
than a tabletop drill”. She went on to add, “during that exercise, part of the
scenario, interestingly enough, involved a potentially hijacked plane and someone
calling on a cell phone, among other aspects of the scenario that were very
strange when twelve days later, as you know, we had the actual event. Source:
Mineta Transportation Institute, October 30th, 2001, p. 108, in
C/11T
Conclusion
A question to consider is, is it plausible to suspect, that a hijacking training scenario was being carried
out on 9/11? We know that many training exercises were happening on 9/11, and
it was not just a normal day in aviation, in fact just the opposite of what we
have been led to believe. It was a very busy day with many war games and
training exercises, with scenarios of planes being hijacked and flown into
buildings along with simulated inserted blips on radar screens.
