Tuesday, 11 July 2017

Analysis of Steve De'ak's "Frozen Smoke" Claim in the Michael Hezarkhani Video

By Mark Conlon

This is a short analysis of Steve De'ak's claim which he made during an interview with Jim Fetzer on the 26th March 2017, where Steve De'ak claimed the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhani video "freezes". After hearing this claim I decided to conduct a short analysis on the 13th April 2017 and I am publishing the finding here today after clarifying some information from Steve De'ak on the 10th July 2017.

See below: for my short analysis of the smoke/fumes plume

I have clarified from Steve De'ak the "time-frame" which he was referring to regarding the frames which that were "allegedly" frozen in the Michael Hezarkhani video in his interview with Jim Fetzer. He confirmed to me on the 10th July 2017 that it was when the plane "enters" the video shot until the plane "impacts" the South Tower. The reason for asking Steve De'ak for clarification was because I was unsure of the exact time-frame he referred to in the video footage. This is what lead me to conduct two different time-frame studies of the video footage smoke/fumes plume. See the 2nd analysis findings below.

See below: "close-up" comparison of the smoke/fumes plume characteristic differences in the different frames, from just before the plane "crashes" into the South Tower to when the plane "impacts" the South Tower.

The two analysis studies above "conclusively" demonstrate that the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhan video footage was "NOT" frozen in the frames as Steve De'ak claimed. 

Information update:
I can now update some new information after my many back and forth comments with Steve De'ak through his YouTube channel. I can now confirm on 10th July 2017 that Steve De'ak told me he has "retracted" his claims for "frozen" smoke/fumes in the Michael Hezarkhani video. 

See below: 

Although this might solve this matter of frozen smoke/fumes, it doesn't solve the "new" claims which Steve De'ak is proposing about the Michael Hezarkhani video, which I will be addressing in another blog soon. What I can say is, it appears yet again that "false" claims are being made and circulated across the internet about the Michael Hezarkhan video footage which has been a characteristic over a long time period with an apparant focus to "discredit" the video fooatge and portray it as "video fakery", something which I speak about at length in other blogs. The question that has to be aksed is: Why is it so important to discredit this piece of video footage?

Characteristics: The discrediting of the video evidence - Michael Hezarkhani video

Please read this interesting article written by Andrew Johnson of checktheevidence.com regarding Steve De'ak's 9/11 Crash Test. Link below:

This case is now closed...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.